Without asking for any permission from their
authors I've been circulating these messages among the following
lists of which I am either a member or owner, and will -for the
sake of the truth to those who seek the truth- try to continue to devote as much
time and effort on this; deeply thank to eveyone for their valuable
contributions.
>
> On other points: It is a nonsensical exaggeration to say
that inflected languages 'do not follow rules'. >
> Mark
Newbrook
To my understanding, Polat Kaya is certainly not
claiming that the inflected languages do not follow any rule! To the
contrary, his theory was based on the analysis of well-established laws of those
inflected languages, the laws which acquired their relative
independencies from a perfect model proto language some thousands years
ago.
BTW, I, like many others, do feel that
SIL.org (Ethnologue) have a hidden agenda. Why don't they just drop the
bible translating, and become just an academic organization? Not that I am
being political, but are they flooding the field with religious people.
And then comes the question: WHY do you
insist on suggesting utter denial of GENESIS?
Regards,
Kamil Kartal