From: Rob
Message: 789
Date: 2003-06-30
> In a message dated 30/06/03 16:22:20 GMT Daylight Time,psychologists". Because behind
> hubeyh@... writes:
>
> Even allowing for newspaper hyperbole, these claims are the sort of
> extravagant conclusions you'd expect from "evolutionary
> it all there is usually a less than camouflaged aim of provingwhere at all
> possible that there are fundamental "differences" between ethnicgroups. Where
> this all leads you can guess and even if most of the academicfigures
> associated with this school of thought feign surprise at anybodydrawing racist
> conclusions from their work, less reputable characters are fallingover themselves to
> use it to try and give their own nauseous theories a pseudo-scientific gloss.
>processing
> Yes, of course the brain behaves differently when when somebody is
> Chinese. There are more homophones, so it would hardly besurprising if a
> literate Chinese speaker inevitably thought, consciously orsubconsciously, about
> the means used to differentiate between these homophones in thewritten
> language. Writing is *visual*, d'oh. Did we really need apsychologist to tell
> people this?!?leave
>
> I do wish these evolutionary psychologists would bugger off and
> language to linguists.Um, I think you grossly misinterpreted the article there. Perhaps
>
> BTW, what has this got to do with Nostratic?
>
> Ed.