From: Gerry
Message: 467
Date: 2003-03-01
----- Original Message -----From: Andy HoweySent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 6:46 AMSubject: Nostratic vs. Proto-Nostratic (was RE: [Nostratica] Re: Swadesh Lists)Gerry:Nostratic is to Proto-Nostratic what Indo-European is to Proto-Indo-European. Nostratic is the name of the theoretic macro-family that encompasses Indo-European, Altaic, Uralic, etc., whereas Proto-Nostratic is the name of the theoretic "language" from which the resultant member languages (Proto-Indo-European, etc.) of the Nostratic macrofamily are descended/derived. Likewise with Indo-European. It is the name of the language family that encompasses Gemanic, Italic, Celtic, Slavic, Baltic, etc.). Proto-Indo-European is the "language" from which the member language groups are descended/derived. In short, Nostratic is the name of the group, and Proto-Nostratic is the name of the language. Following and extending your statement below, one could say that there is no need for Proto-Indo-European because there is already the Indo-European language family. However, Proto-Nostratic and Proto-Indo-European are the root languages of their respective (mega-)families. Hopefully, this helps.BTW, as I understand some of current classification proposals, there are people who favor listing Afro-Asiatic (Hamito-Semitic) as a sister group of Nostratic rather than a daughter group. Therefore, instead of havingNostratic - Indo-EuropeanAfro-AsiaticUralicAltaic...We would haveNostratic - Indo-EuropeanAfro-AsiaticUralicAltaic...Afro-Asiatic - SemiticHamiticChadic....Andy Howey