Re: Swadesh Lists

Hello H.M. Hubey,

Thanks for your alternate opinion that Nostratic is NOT synonymous with Proto-Nostratic. That's what I think as well. IMO, if Nostratic is the megalanguage family, then there should NOT be a need for Proto-Nostratic.

You write:

English is Germanic, and hence it is descended from proto-Germanic. But protoGermanic is
descended from ProtoNostratic hence, English is "Nostratic".

I reply:

Yes, English is Germanic (IMO descended from Germanic). Because English is a subgroup of Germanic which is a subgroup of Indo-European, which in turn is a sub-group of Nostratic, an hierarchical structure is established.

Yes, I also understand your automotive example. Except Honda, vehicle, and car all mean the same thing. Are you perhaps implying that languages should have the same "non-hierarchical" measurements?

This becomes a tricky etymological problem. Please explain further.

Gerry

----- Original Message -----

From: H.M. Hubey

To: Nostratica@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 5:56 PM

Subject: Re: [Nostratica] Re: Swadesh Lists

Geraldine Reinhardt wrote:

Ned, First of all apparently your application to join last week didn't register but I have just approved your membership. You are now a member of Nostratica. Welcome. Yes, I understand that the Nostratic Language is a mega language (conjectured) which includes I-E, Uralic & Altaic, Semitic (Cushitic), Kartvelian, Dravidian, and Yukaghirian. I didn't realize that Nostratic was synonymous with Proto-Nostratic.....
It is not.

It is easy to explain via an example. English, Dutch, German, Swedish etc are members of
a set which is called the (set of) Germanic (languages) e.g. the name for this set of languages
is "Germanic". It is hypothesized that these languages descend from a single/unitary language
called Proto-Germanic.

had been under the impression that Proto meant ancestor to (or coming before). I also was unaware that Nostratic LanguageS (in the plural) were languages descended from a single ProtoNostratic language such as Proto-IndoEuropean.

English is Germanic, and hence it is descended from proto-Germanic. But protoGermanic is
descended from ProtoNostratic hence, English is "Nostratic".

Another example: Honda is a car. A car is a vehicle. Hence Honda is a vehicle.

Now that's REALLY confusing. Plus, your listing below: "Proto-Indo-European, Proto-Afro-Asiatic, Proto-Uralic, Latin, English, Spanish, Arabic, Hebrew, Tamil, Turkish, Korean...and on and on" is haphazard and includes languages and proto languages that show no subordination one to another. For example: Latin and English and Spanish are all members of Indo-European. Perhaps you need to research the hierarchy of language families on the web (if indeed there is any pre-ordained hierarchy). Actually, the more I ponder this concept I also have difficulty separating a language from a regional dialect. About Homo erectus not having a language -- we simply aren't sure of that. What we do know is that manipulating fire was known to erectus (plus he/she lived in a group) and to manage fire takes the ability to communicate. Whether or not this communication was verbal or not, we cannot be positive. Gerry