Re: Proto-Celtic

From: Geraldine Reinhardt
Message: 416
Date: 2003-02-22

Ha, ha, even paleontologists can't agree.  Many of the newly discovered finds such as Mungo Man are being given a joint billing i.e containing features of "both" Australopithecines and Homo whatever. Paleontologists then select which camp they wish to align themselves with (that usually coincides with the focus of their research grants). 
 
Gerry
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham@...>
To: Nostratica@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 3:37 PM
Subject: [Nostratica] Re: Proto-Celtic

I think this is a question for
palaeontologists rather than
linguists.  While it does happen in
biology, I think the only instances
in language occur when a language
becomes a 'classical' language,
such as French and Latin.  Even
then, Mediaeval Latin did have its
own innovations.
Richard.
 
 


 

Previous in thread: 415
Next in thread: 417
Previous message: 415
Next message: 417

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all Nostratica posts