H.M. Hubey, likewise you also have begun irritating
me. Here are the questions I posed: If there was "no Vedic Horse" at
Harappa, then which type of horse was it? Couldn't have been Equus Przevaalskii (with 18 pairs of ribs)
because you claim it was not the one described by the Rig
Veda. Was it Equus Sivalensis with only 17
pairs of ribs? AGAIN, you are the one who said that there was no Vedic
Horse at Harappa; you also said that Equus Przevaalskii wasn't the one described
by the Rig Veda. I am simply trying to ascertain which "horse" was at
Harappa. Now THAT information should be of interest to those on the
list.
Gerry
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 5:34
AM
Subject: Re: [Nostratica] Vedic Horse
Demolishes Witzel's Theory
Gerry,
You are beginning to irritate me. I posted
something that could be of interest to Nostratics. You
write "You
claim...". I claimed nothing. Even after what I wrote you are still insisting
I answer
to something I have nothing to do with. What exactly is your
problem?