From: Gerry Reinhart-Waller
Message: 346
Date: 2001-09-26
----- Original Message -----
From: Glen Gordon <glengordon01@...>
To: <waluk@...>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:11 PM
Subject: Why are you being an ass?
> Gerry, Etruscan *is* in Italy... Who said otherwise, you ass??
> You're just rambling bullshit and I would like it to stop so that a
> more educated discussion can ensue. I know ALL the links available
> online on Etruscan because I search regularly. However, I also don't
> DEPEND on the internet for all my knowledge because that would be
> foolish and can lead to complete miseducation, something that you
> appear to be representative of.
>
> If you had gone to a library, you'd know of Massimo, you'd know
> how many words are deciphered, and you'd even know a little
> Etruscan syntax and morphology. Please visit a library and don't
> drag me into inane, confrontational discussions on the Nostratic
> List again, please.
>
>
> >From: "Gerry Reinhart-Waller" <waluk@...>
> >Reply-To: nostratic@yahoogroups.com
> >To: <nostratic@yahoogroups.com>
> >Subject: Re: [nostratic] And finally...
> >Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:51:08 -0700
> >
> >Well Glennie, at least I fairly certain it's of Italian origin. Placing
it
> >in another domain sounds kinda fishy. And since Alekseev also placed
> >Etruscan in Italy, that's my opinion.
> >Here's a link for you:
> >http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Crete/4060/etruscan1.htm
> >It appears to be fairly accurate.
> >
> >But I must admit that when I claimed that the language still hadn't been
> >translated, that was old information. Actually quite a lot has been done
> >since the Alekseev Ms. was written as the above link confirms. The only
> >text so far still not translated is: The Tabula cortunensis (still
> >untranslated)
> >
> >Gerry
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Glen Gordon
> > To: nostratic@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [nostratic] And finally...
> >
> >
> > Gerry:
> > >Dear Glennie. A language with only a vocabulary is nothing more than
a
> > >dictionary. One needs syntax (among other things) to breathe life
into
> >the
> > >words.
> >
> > Whatever, Gerry. Bye bye now. You have no clue about Etruscan.
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > Glen Gordon
> > Webdeveloper
> >
> > home: http://glen_gordon.tripod.com
> > email: glengordon01@...
> > ph: (604)904.0320
> > -------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > >
> > >Gerry
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Glen Gordon
> > > To: nostratic@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:32 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [nostratic] And finally...
> > >
> > >
> > > Gerry:
> > > >About those hundreds of words -- hate to tell you, but hundreds
> >still
> > > > >doesn't constitute a language.
> > >
> > > And what does?? A thousand, ten thousand, a million? Is English
> > > still an undecipherable language??! Please, Gerry, your twisted
> > > rantings are unappreciated and it seems that most disagree with
> > > you on this list.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>