Dear Glen and Nostraticists:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Glen Gordon" <glengordon01@...>
To: <nostratic@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 7:56 PM
Subject: [nostratic] Pat's "RESPONSE"
>
> Pat learns new words:
> >Unlike Bomhard, I will adresss these points of criticism --- even >though
> >they originate from a detestable smart-ass.
[GG]
> You may call me what you like but any bum off the street can
> twist IE to suit their claims. Roots like *bel-, *meley-, and
> *mo-n-u- remain fantasies. There's nothing more to say here.
[PCR]
Well, if we could only hope that you would have "nothing more to say"!
Unfortunately, as I write this, I notice another email from you in the box. I would have preferred your commitment in this email to be valid but then, of course, children have no conception of keeping their words.
As for your usual ignorant remarks:
*bel- can be found on page 96 of Pokorny, and I am certain that he and his collaborators knew more about IE than you ever will.
*meley- is found on page 723 as an implicit component of *meli-t-, 'honey; or is it your auagust opinion that the views of all the greats in IE studies are wrong, and IE roots are not CVC? Or perhaps that *-i does not derive from *-y? Presuming you are entitled to an opinion, a proposition I found ludicrous.
*mo-n-u- is found on page 728 and on page 700. It is there written *monu-s, and I merely indicated the proper segmentation since I am asserting it derives from Nostratic *mo:.
Obviously, you are ONLY capable of scanning Pokorny as well as your other failings.
Pat
PATRICK C. RYAN | PROTO-LANGUAGE@... (501) 227-9947 * 9115 W. 34th St. Little Rock, AR 72204-4441 USA WEBPAGES: PROTO-LANGUAGE: http://www.geocities.com/proto-language/ and PROTO-RELIGION: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/2803/proto-religion/indexR.html "Veit ec at ec hecc, vindgá meiði a netr allar nío, geiri vndaþr . . . a þeim meiþi, er mangi veit, hvers hann af rótom renn." (Hávamál 138)