At 19:16 24.1.2001 -0000, you wrote:

>sentence. I also wish to thank Haukur for acknowledging
>the potential interest of the grammatical treatises.
>I only hope that people do not find the text too diffucult.
>Remember that it is what you understand that really counts.
>Even if you only understand a word here and there, it still
>is valuable to read the text!

Keth - your wish to improve our knowledge is to
be commended. But do you really think that your
"stuff" belongs on a list where people are trying
to learn the rudiments of ON grammar?

Your understanding of the original texts is
far too faulty for your comments to be of use to
any of us (unless we understand them better than
you do). Your errors are TOO MANY. I think Haukur
is to polite to tell you so, but I think it is very
bad for the students to read all this faulty and
misunderstood grammar, which you have decided to
pour upon us.

No offense meant,
Eysteinn

P.S. I'm sure that Haukur and Óskar are very able
to explain the FOUR Grammatical Treatises to us,
if and when they think the students are ready to
digest such heady matters. But I do not think it is
a good idea for you, Keth, to confuse the students
with your hardly-understood ideas.

Again, no offense meant, but, Keth (Kjell) - you're
totally at sea here.

E.