From: cjyothibabu
Message: 71620
Date: 2013-11-21
>This is brilliant!
Of course
a form for sarsapa which does not exist in any Dravidian language but only in Sanskrit!>First you construct
Let me make a slight correction: existing as a loan word from substrate Dravidian, for which no Indo Aryan etymology is available, and I have suggested a Dravidian etymology.
about the fallacy?>Have you wondered
No
causes the elision of Sanskrit /s/ in various Dravidian languages…..> Next you ignore the regular sound changes which
You are repeating irrelevant argument. There is no etymology for the word in Sanskrit. I derived it from root ‘kAzh’.
everything was from the primary source written by Krishnamurthi and nothing from any secondary source.> In this discussion
I dealt with it in my previous mail.
-Jyothi