> On what basis are you asserting that my quotation is from
> secondary sources when infact everything about the primary
> source is given?
Because Krishnamurti wrote in detail about ‘s’, ‘k’, ‘c’ etc
in Dravidian languages in the same book, which are relevant
to the discussion under progress, but you have quoted “Tamil
drops an Indo-aryan s” which is not relevant to the
discussion and is out of context to the discussion.
Everything about primary source will be given in many
secondary sources.
-Jyothi
[Quote-tail deleted. -BMS]