Re: Substrate language which contributed sarSapa to

Shivraj wrote:

> You may have overlooked Bhadriraju Krishnamurthy because
> he said exactly the same thing that I wrote.

Did Krishnamurti himself “overlook” what he said? I am sure
he didn’t. Then why did he spend time and energy researching
on Proto Dravidian ‘k’ and ‘c’, after stating that?

> In general any hypothesis should be testable with data. In
> the current discussion I provided the data which you could
> not refute so you must look into whether your hypothesis
> is correct or not.

I have no need to refute that data. I know and may others in
the list know that the data you provided is irrelevant to my
hypothesis. Many members in the list are familiar with Indo
Aryan and Dravidian languages and their relationship.

-Jyothi