From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 71409
Date: 2013-10-17
> If Arnaud has no knowledge of Sanskrit and Vedic SanskritYour hypothesis is false. Apparently you’ve not bothered to
> how can Dr B's grandstanding statement that it isNot necessarily, no. It obviously depends on what kinds of
> "dishonest to claim here that Arnaud's review does not
> entirely demolish Talageri's main linguistic "result"" be
> correct? Since Talageri wrote about Vedas: a person
> critiquing his work atleast needs to know the language
> Vedas are written in? No?