From: shivkhokra
Message: 71406
Date: 2013-10-17
Dear Brian,
If Arnaud has no knowledge of Sanskrit and Vedic Sanskrit how can Dr B's grandstanding statement that it is "dishonest to claim here that Arnaud's review does not entirely demolish Talageri's main linguistic "result"" be correct? Since Talageri wrote about Vedas: a person critiquing his work atleast needs to know the language Vedas are written in? No?
---In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, <cybalist@yahoogroups.com> wrote:At 9:52:51 AM on Wednesday, October 16, 2013,
shivkhokra@... wrote:
> Dear Dr Brighenty,Of course not; Arnaud was quite straightforward about that
> Are you suggesting Arnaud knows Sanskrit and Vedic
> Sanskrit?
in his review.
> What about your good self?No, we’ll address it now, because it’s the real issue (from
> Whether Talageri knows it or not we will address later.
which I’m sure that you would like to divert attention).
Brian