Re: Is Basque IE?

From: Bhrihskwobhloukstroy
Message: 71319
Date: 2013-09-18

>
>
>> Dear group members,
>
>>
>
>> let me try and summarize what's been going on with this topic so far.
>> Since I posted > my first message over two weeks ago, I received few
>> replies. The most frequent
>
>> ones are fairly weak criticisms, by D. G. Kilday, mostly based on:
>
>> - a rejection of key parts of Michelena's and Trask's commonly accepted
>> internal
>
>> reconstruction of Pre-Basque (it would be interesting to be pointed
>> to some
>
>> published material where such rejection is supported by some systematic
>
>> evidence);
>
>> - an analysis of a very small percentage of my etymologies, which are
>> either refuted > on various grounds (incl. the critic's unorthodox
>> reconstruction of Pre-Basque), or
>
>> dismissed as "loans" when the similarity with other IE terms is too
>> evident to be
>
>> otherwise dismissed.
>
>>
>
>> Comments by other fellow linguists would be very welcome.
>
> [Tavi]
>
> It's rather obvious (Paleo-Basque) has a Celtic *substrate* as well as other
> IE adstrates, namely Italoid (aka "Sorothaptic" and "Illyrio-Lusitanian"). I
> consider the Celtic layer to be a substrate rather than an adstrate, not
> only on the evidence of loanwords such as gizon 'man' but mainly from the
> toponyms in -otz (Basque) / -os (Gascon) / -ués (Aragonese) mentioned by
> e.g. Rohlfs and deriving from Celtic *uxsV- 'high', whose femenine
> superlative *uxs-ama: is found in Gaulish Uxama, Celtiberian Usama.

*Bhr.: If this is a sort of opinion poll, I find Gianfranco's
Indo-European treatment of Michelena's and Trask's Pre-Basque fully
convincing. Somebody already knows that I envisage a direct
transformation of a substrateless Proto-Indo-European into any
Indo-European linguistic class, each one within its Bronze Age area. I
have therefore no difficulty in getting Basque into such a frame;
conveniently verified Old Celtic place-names in Late Antique and
Mediaeval Vasco-Aquitanian area should testify to a continuity of
Celtic rather than Basque from Proto-Indo-European, otherwise I'm
completely satisfied not only with an emergence of Basque from
Proto-Indo-European somewhere The same holds true, in my really humble
opinion, for Čašule's Burū́šaskī