Re: Stacking up on standard works

There's no proof that it's in fact the same word; an /o/-grade would
be equally possible

2013/3/13, cewhalen <cewhalen@...>:

>
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Bhrihskwobhloukstroy
> <bhrihstlobhrouzghdhroy@...> wrote:
>>
>> 2013/3/12, cewhalen <cewhalen@...>:
>
>> > eu-thené:s = in abundance G; yo-gn = numerous/abundant Ar; a:-hanás- =
>> > swelling S; a:-ganis^ = full P;
>> > (note Ar shows opt KW>Kw before K() > KY / _ e )
>> > (note Pers shows opt KW retained not K() > KY / _ e )
>> > or
>> > (note Ar and Pers show opt KWe>ö>o )
>> >
>> > or
>> >
>> > * sgWHeno+ > sthénos = strength, * n-sgWHeto+ > áskhetos G; azgata- =
>> > not to
>> > be held in Av;
>> > (note G shows opt KW>K/T / _ e (or dia.))
>> > (note Av shows opt KW retained not K() > KY / _ e )
>> > or
>> > (note Ar and Pers show opt KWe>ö>o )
>> >
>> (...)
>>
>> *Bhr.: would You exclude simple /o/-ablaut in Armenian, Persian, and
>> Avestan?
>>
>
> Yes, it's the exact same word. Which have -o-etos ?
>
>
>