Re: Stacking up on standard works

From: Rick McCallister
Message: 71032
Date: 2013-03-05

So then square and corner go back to the same root in Latin>

--- On Tue, 3/5/13, stlatos <sean@...> wrote:

From: stlatos <sean@...>
Subject: [tied] Re: Stacking up on standard works
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, March 5, 2013, 2:22 AM

 


--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "stlatos" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "dgkilday57" wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "stlatos" wrote:
>
> > > There's no reason to expect a regular change for either above; quadru- shows tr > dr , dr > tr in taeter , maybe vitrum , and definitely:
> >
> > In _quadri/u-_ we may have contamination with an old word for 'whetstone', *quadrum, replaced by _co:s_; cf. OE _hwaet_ 'keen, bold', OS _hwat_ 'id.', OHG _(h)waz_ 'sharp, rough, severe', ON _hvatr_ 'bold, vigorous'; OE _hwettan_, OHG _wezzan_, ON _hvetja_ 'to whet', from PGmc *xwatjanan. Whetstones are generally square and *quadrum could have passed into the meaning 'square', whence _quadra:re_ 'to make square', and squares have 4 corners.
> >
>
>
> That is certainly a possibility that I would never have thought of. There's a reason for that.
>

Also, the L cognate is supposedly:

tri-quetrus = 3-cornered / triangular L;

also w -dr- > -tr-.