Re: Italo-Celtic dialect base words?

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "stlatos" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "stlatos" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "dgkilday57" wrote:
> > >
They were associated with the Silva Hercy:nia, and if Proto-Celtic borrowed Volcan *Perku:nia: as *Ferku:nia:, that would explain the lack of *p...kW assimilation.

> > > I do not find Sean's ad-hoc claim that Celtic did not assimilate *perkWu- to *kWerkWu- convincing,
> >
> >
> > It's not ad hoc. kW > k by u first, which is seen in Greek, too. Compare fairhwus = world, fairguni = mtn Got; showing that at least sometimes KW>K by u
>
>
> There's also kW ( > xW ) > 0:
>
> Hercynia silva (trans L) Celt; perynja = oak forest R;
>
> Perkú:nas OLh; perkú:nas Lh;
> PerunU OR; perún R;
>
> and kW > p in the Slavic rain ritual of Perperuna (or Dodola \ Dudulja \ etc.), probably named after Perun's wife (if so cogn. Fjörgyn OIc;). Did Slavic borrow the name of their god from an IE in which kW > xW and his wife's from an IE in which kW > p ? Where did Parjánya- S; come from? Is it worth all this, as well as saying Gmc had p-p from Celtic in 1 word but Celtic got h-q from something else in 1 w the same shape so p-p can no longer be seen there, instead of looking at all ev. in all words for kW, seeing its opt. changes, and the possibility of clusters creating (opt.) oddities?
>

Also, in:

keraunós = striking lightning G;

even if borrowed, it would be from IE in which p>kW-kW and rkW > rxW at least, even if all were reg.