From: stlatos
Message: 70817
Date: 2013-01-28
>Then where does this second h2 come from if the only dif. is which fem. ending was added?
> (Non-Unicode transliteration: *dHlh2nk(')ih2 > th'alassa vs.
> *dHlh2enk(')h2-eh2 > dalagkha:)
> kháro:n, leíbe:thron, arphús can (leíbe:thron does) have voicelessWhy would kH- > (instead of gH- > ) in:
> */-kH-/, */-tH-/, */-pH-/,
> therefore no need for "opt." (ánthro:pos <and how could this not be < andr- anér- ?
> *h2endH-ro-h3kW-o-s has no connection with dró:ps)
>
>
> 2013/1/27, stlatos :
> >
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Bhrihskwobhloukstroy wrote:
> >>
> >> It should be *dÊ°lhânkâ ½ââ ¾ihâ > thálassa vs. *dÊ°lhâenkâ ½ââ
> >> ¾hâ-ehâ > dalagkhÄ
> >
> >
> > I can't tell what you're writing thanks to the "update" from yahoo.com,
> > but if you're questioning why no kH > g in Mac, you should know that in add.
> > to:
> >
> > thálassa = sea G; dalágkhan (a) Mac;
> >
> > Mac shows Ch in words like:
> >
> > kháro:n, leíbe:thron, arphús, etc.
> >
> > making it likely that dH > tH > T ( > D [opt.) in Mac, with many details
> > (including transcription) uncertain.
> >
> >
> > There are a few more with uncertain corr.:
> >
> > ánthro:pos G; dró:ps Mac;
> >
> > áliza = white poplar Mac; alphinia Thes G;
> >