From: Tavi
Message: 70605
Date: 2012-12-14
>Etruscan spur(a) 'city' can be found as Latin Suburra as an early
> But even if Oscan retained *sr-, Etruscan allows that as well, with
> <sren> 'image' vel sim., <srenchva> 'set of images' vel sim.
>
> > That's also right, although in the case of Etruscan, this and other
> > groups arose from vocal syncope.
>
> What evidence do you have for vocal syncope in such words?
>
> > My guess is that Latin Ro:ma is aborrowed into Latin as -o:-? (Some scholars have denied that Etruscan
> > borrowing from *Ru:ma in an o-less language like Etruscan (although
> > Italoid had no /o/, according to Villar).
>
> And what other examples do you have of native Etruscan -u:- being
>I'm following Villar's argument that in a language with a 4-vowel system
> Finally, Rome is not a river,'Water-Bearer' vel sim. (i.e. generic 'River', like Welsh Aber-).
>
> > But it's on a river whose name is from Etruscan, BTW.
>
> I agree that Tiberis is from archaic Etruscan *Thi-hwar-
>Not really. As I said before, Etruscan thivhari, thepri-, thefri- is
> but a city at a ford on a river.etymology.
>
> > Unfortunately, your etymology doesn't point to 'ford' bur rather to
> > 'plain' or 'countryside'. IMHO, a native Latin etymology of Rome is
> > extremely unlikely.
>
> What is extremely unlikely is that scholars will ever agree on the
>Well, historical linguistics isn't like mathematics, so it allows a