From: stlatos
Message: 70359
Date: 2012-10-31
>It's ce not se > z(e) in Sp. Aznar only makes sense if from Bq * asYenari with Asenarius a Latinization of it (otherwise > X Aznario).
> At 9:01:00 PM on Tuesday, October 30, 2012, stlatos wrote:
>
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Brian M. Scott"
> > <bm.brian@> wrote:
>
> >> At 4:01:13 PM on Tuesday, October 30, 2012, stlatos wrote:
>
> >>> Where did Asena:rius come from, if not brd < Bq?
>
> >> Cognomen from <asinus>.
>
> > Then why Aznar?
>
> Presumably because the Latin (or Romance) sibilant sounded
> more like the Basque laminal sibilant than like the Basque
> apical sibilant.
>
> Brian
>