From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 70355
Date: 2012-10-31
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, BhrihskwobhloukstroyA sequence /kt/ > /xt/ > /φt/ > /pt/ (and similarly for /ks/
> <bhrihstlobhrouzghdhroy@...> wrote:
>> Does the sequence /kt/ > /tʃ/ due to /kt/ > /xt/ > /çt/ >
>> /jt/ > /tj/ (suggested by areal dialectology) really
>> imply palatalization of anteconsonantal *velar* /n/?
> The oddity of KC in Romance is easily seen in Rum. kt > pt
> , ks > ps (octo: > opt , coxa > coapsA);