Re: Basque onddo

From: Bhrihskwobhloukstroy
Message: 70347
Date: 2012-10-30

Does the sequence /kt/ > /tʃ/ due to /kt/ > /xt/ > /çt/ > /jt/ > /tj/
(suggested by areal dialectology) really imply palatalization of
anteconsonantal *velar* /n/?

2012/10/30, stlatos <sean@...>:
>
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Bhrihskwobhloukstroy
> <bhrihstlobhrouzghdhroy@...> wrote:
>>
>> I fail to see a palatalized result of /n/ in onddo (sorry) and don't
>> understand the formulation "in Western Romance, the phoneme N changed
>> into NY > nY > ñ": it would require at least a phonotactic restriction
>> (to intervocalic position?) and a heavy diatopic reduction (the most
>> widespread result is rather a velarization)
>
>
> The most common change involves Latin gn (pronounced Nn), after gn- > n-,
> with Nn > NYn > nYn > nYnY > ññ . A form of Romance either had all Ng > NYg
> (later > Ng) too, with borrowing into Bq at the right time, or Bq was
> influenced by, but not exactly like, a neighboring Romance for this rule.
> It's the common spread of Y in Romance (ie, Spanish kt > kYt > kYtY > ytY >
> ycY (factum > hecho)) that indicates the change Ng > ndd resulted first from
> pal. of N, very common there; otherwise there's no rule in either with no
> good expl. of g > gY etc. by itself.
>
>
>>
>> 2012/10/29, stlatos <sean@...>:
>> >
>> >
>> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "dgkilday57" <dgkilday57@> wrote:
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Tavi" <oalexandre@> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > >
>> >> > This is very unlikely. Spanish pollo gives Basque oilo just as
>> >> > Romance
>> >> > fongo gives onddo (with expressive palatalization).
>> >>
>> >> I rejected that etymology before, and believers in "expressive
>> >> palatalization" need to explain why a mushroom would produce such a
>> >> demand
>> >> for expressivity in speakers that only palatalization could satisfy
>> >> it.
>> >> Are we talking about a MAGIC mushroom?
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > In Western Romance, the phoneme N changed into NY > nY > ñ . Since N
>> > was
>> > not a phoneme before k/g (but only classified as C+nasal, automatically
>> > acquiring the place of the following stop), it didn't change. However,
>> > in
>> > Bq, nasals weren't automatically given the place of the following stop.
>> > Therefore, Ng > nYg > nYgY > etc.
>> >
>> >
>> > The existence of clusters like mX is seen in:
>> >
>> > * XasYEmXálXi >
>> > Acenari = (name), azebari / azegari / azeri / azari Biz = fox Bq;
>> >
>
>
>
>