From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 70319
Date: 2012-10-28
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Brian M. Scott"Since I don't dispute it, your point is rather lacking in
> <bm.brian@...> wrote:
>> Irrelevant. I don't deny that many of the languages in
>> that grab-bag must have been related to one another.
> This iss my point.
>> The fact remains that Palæo-IE as you define it is not aSo far you've ignored the objection, called it a waste of
>> language family in any meaningful sense of the term. I
>> repeat:
> Don't waste out time!