From: shivkhokra
Message: 70171
Date: 2012-10-11
>Obvious? Big talk then it should be easy to show a piece of evidence where Indo aryan is different from Sanskrit.
> At 7:26:08 AM on Wednesday, October 10, 2012, shivkhokra
> wrote:
>
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Brian M. Scott"
> > <bm.brian@> wrote:
>
> >> At 8:25:33 AM on Tuesday, October 9, 2012, shivkhokra
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Brian M. Scott"
> >>> <bm.brian@> wrote:
>
> >> [...]
>
> >> >> No. It's a list of Indo-Aryan names.
>
> >>> Please give some examples on how Indo Aryan is different
> >>> than Sanskrit.
>
> >> Waste of time. Considering how long you've been discussing
> >> such matters, the request is clear evidence that your
> >> ignorance, whether the wilful result of ideological
> >> commitment or the accidental byproduct of sheer stupidity,
> >> is irremediable.
>
> > This is an ad hominem attack is against the list rules
> > and quite distasteful from an administrator.
>
> It's an obvious inference from the available data, and I'm
> hardly alone in drawing it. In theory of course you could
> prove me wrong by remedying your ignorance, but I'm not
> about to hold my breath.
>
> > But it does point to your sheer ignorance of Indo AryanYour evidence (Brighenti was also asked for it) will prove you right and me wrong. Though my 2cents are on that you will not be able to find it.
> > and Sanskrit.
>
> <SPLORK!!>
>
> There goes *another* irony meter. And that one was the
> expensive model with the infinity scale, too.
>