Re: Origin of Sanskrit (was: Mapping the Origins and Expansion of...

At 8:10:27 AM on Wednesday, October 10, 2012,
Bhrihskwobhloukstroy wrote:

> I should have written "or even a Urheimat or more for
> completely non-attested language families (the larger the
> Urheimat the smaller is the number of the language
> families; in case of a small Urheimat for each single
> family, the number of these possible but hypothetical
> families grows very high)". That's what I meant, sorry for
> shortness.

In that case I agree; I just don't see anything at all
problematic about it.

Brian