Re: Celtic Ligurian? (was: Ligurian)

At 7:09:19 PM on Thursday, May 31, 2012,
Bhrihskwobhloukstroy wrote:

> 2012/5/24, Brian M. Scott <bm.brian@...>:

>> At 6:10:40 PM on Saturday, May 19, 2012,
>> Bhrihskwobhloukstroy wrote:

>>> Also marg f., an alleged Scandinavism (mǫrk), but -g can
>>> at least suggest Urverwandtschaft

>> Though it's worth noting that DIL also has a citation <co
>> Temraig Mairci>, with <c>. For that matter, <Hákon> appears
>> in the Annals of Ulster (AU 847.4) as <Agonn> and in the
>> Chronicum Scotorum (CS 847.3) as <Agond>.

> Bhrihskwobhloukstroy: that would be the ON loanform

Yes, that's my point: these instances show that the <-g> of
<marg> doesn't suggest much of anything.

Brian