From: Bhrihskwobhloukstroy
Message: 69602
Date: 2012-05-13
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, BhrihskwobhloukstroyBhrihskwobhloukstroy:
> <bhrihstlobhrouzghdhroy@...> wrote:
>> I've detected PIE through toponymy and it's the direct ancestor of
>> Celtic in situ.
>> Tavi:
> Sorry, but this is contradicted by actual evidence. Celtic has shared
> isoglosses with Eastern IE languages, namely Greek and Indo-Iranian. See
> Karl Horst Schmidtt for more details.
> Tavi:Bhrihskwobhloukstroy:
> Also Old European Hydronymy (OEH)
> isn't Celtic at all.
> Tavi:Bhrihskwobhloukstroy:
>> > If you really want to gather evidence of older IE stages, I'd
> recommend
>> > you study other language families which were in contact with IE or
>> > genetically related to it, namely Altaic, Kartvelian, Afrasian
> (Semitic)
>> > and Tyrrhenian (Etruscan). I myself learnt a great deal from Bomhard
> (as
>> > well as other Nostraticists), in despite I disagree with his model.
>> Bhrihskwobhloukstroy:
>> That's what I'm doing since 1989 (when I started to study
> Macrocomparativism)
>> Tavi:
> But it doesn't appear to have any impact on your theory.
>