From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 69433
Date: 2012-04-26
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "dgkilday57"[...]
> <dgkilday57@...> wrote:
>>>> Why create confusion by using an established term in anThis is obviously utterly irrelevant. The fact remains that
>>>> idiosyncratic way?
>>> More than "using" it, I'm *explaining* it. That is, I
>>> see as a substrate adstrate what other people think it's
>>> a genetic relationship.
>> But your parastrate is still not identical to other
>> people's Italo-Celtic. You could simply call it Italic
>> parastrate.
> Then "Italo-Celtic" is only an illusion caused by an Italic
> substrate/adstrate in Celtic.