From: Tavi
Message: 69385
Date: 2012-04-20
>phonological developments show that Ligurian cannot be a Celtic
> Strabo was correct in distinguishing Ligurians from Celts. Several
>as Porcifera (Plin.), now Polcevere, evidently means 'salmon-bearing'
> 1. PIE *p > Lig. /p/. The river Porcobera (Sent. Minuc.), Latinized
>place-names (and god-names) associated with warm springs, collected by
> 2. PIE *gWH > Lig. /b/. Lucus Bormani (Itin. Ant.) and other Lig.
>PIE zero-grade *bHr.g^H- (Celt. *brig-, Gmc. *burg-) from *bHerg^H- 'to
> 3. PIE *r. > Lig. /ar/. Bargae (Tab. Vel.) evidently continues the
>pan-Celtic. He explains Neviodunum (sic) as an orthographic variant of
> 4. PIE *eu > Lig. /eu/ against *ou, which Matasovic' considers
>aspiratae as mediae. It also shows *gW > /b/ and *kW > /p/.
> Ligurian agrees with Celtic in rendering the non-labiovelar mediae
>Ligurian would be part of the Italoid (Villar) aka Sorotaptic