From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 69349
Date: 2012-04-17
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Rick McCallisterYou guess? It's obvious.
> <gabaroo6958@...> wrote:
>> No one ever said Trask was infallible, least of all him.
> Then why'd you say: He was a scholar who never made a
> pronouncement that he couldn't back up 100%.
> I guess there's a distinction between being infallible and
> never saying anything w/o evidence,
> but that's what I tried to show was wrong.And you failed. 'Without evidence acceptable to Sean
> No one has ever done really good work on Proto-Basque, orRight. Not even the three Napoleons and two Einsteins in
> almost any proto-language, but me.