From: Tavi
Message: 69245
Date: 2012-04-05
>Not exactly, but from the paleo-dialect of the Steppes from which these languages descend.
> > Also Latin si:mius 'monkey, imitator' < *seim- can be linked to ima:go 'image' and aemulus 'imitator;
> > enemy, rival' < *h2eim-.
>
> Yes, but only if the latter words were borrowed from Greek, Armenian or Iranian
>
> > There's also *sem- 'one, the same' (Latin similis) vs. *yem- 'twin' (Sanskrit yamá-).As Latin is a "centum" language, g- could reflex either a palatalized velar stop *g^ or an affricate *dZ which yield *y- in the paleo-dialect of the Steppes.
> But wouldn't Latin gem- "twin" point to another direction
>
> Tavi --you're too busy trying to reinvent the wheel, use the information that's already out there or you'll go bonkersRick, I'm afraid these things aren't covered at all in the IE literature, except perhaps by Gamkrelidze-Ivanov, which aren't exactly mainstream.
>