From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 69007
Date: 2012-03-16
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Brian M. Scott"Why should it be? Neither is <bridd> ~ <bird>, not to
> <bm.brian@...> wrote:
>> At 6:18:45 AM on Thursday, March 15, 2012, Torsten wrote:
>>> However, Norwegian 'ras'. It can't be Slavic liquid
>>> metathesis(?); is it Schrijver's bird lnguage?
>> It's ON <rass>, metathesized from earlier (attested)
>> <ars>.
> Obviously it is ('ars' still in jysk), but why? That's not
> a regular rule.