From: Tavi
Message: 68981
Date: 2012-03-14
>I strongly disagree. Firstly, 'woad' is semantically linked to 'glass', because in ancient times glass had a blueish colour. This is why Germanic *glása-/*glazá- 'glass' is cognate to Celtic *glasto- 'green, blue', reflected in the Gaulish word glossed in Latin as glastum 'woad' (Pliny). They're derivates from PIE *g´helh3-/*ghelh3- 'yellow, green'.
> > Speaking of 'woad', I've seen the Germanic protoform reconstructed as
> > *waizda- (cfr. Greek isatis) elsewhere on this list. As the Latin form
> > is vitrum, there's no possibility of reconstructing anything remotedly
> > similar to a "PIE" root. This is consistent with this being a highly
> > specialized word.
>
> See message #68217, which corrects my earlier posts. I regard the /z/r/-less forms 'meed', 'woad', 'kien' as borrowed from NWB *me:do:-, *waida-, *kaina- in which the */z/ between a vowel and a voiced consonant was vocalized. OE <weard>, <werd> reflect inherited Gmc. *wazDa- 'woad', and Go. <ouisdil> (etc.) reflects Gmc. *wizDila- with /e/-grade, from PIE *wezdH-. In my opinion the Greek and Latin words are unrelated to this.
>