From: Tavi
Message: 68909
Date: 2012-03-10
>tree
> > But it's **still** glottochronology as they put absolute dates to
> > clades. But I don't think absolute dating can be done without thehelp
> > of extra-linguistic data (archaeology, paleoclimatology).later.
>
> And how do you think they calibrate their tree? Read first, criticise
>If I remember well (the article appeared 8 years ago), they claimed