From: Piotr Gasiorowski Message: 68903 Date: 2012-03-10
W dniu 2012-03-10 18:03, Richard Wordingham pisze:
> One awkward thought arises - I don't see any basis for reading HAR as
> /har/ rather than /hur/.
This ambiguity is less important that the absence of plene spellings,
whether HA-(A-)AR- or HU-(U-)UR-, which suggests that the actual reading
should be /hr/ (phonetic [h&r]).