Re: HORSA vs. EXWA

From: Rick McCallister
Message: 68835
Date: 2012-03-08




From: Brian M. Scott <bm.brian@...>
To: Tavi <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 6:44 AM
Subject: Re: [tied] Re: HORSA vs. EXWA

 

Don't be silly. The word 'cognate' *means* that there is a
genetic relationship. When you say that A and B are
cognate, YOU ARE ASSERTING A GENETIC RELATIONSHIP.


***R Well, yes and no. Theoretically, and by definition, cognates do indicate a genetic relationship BUT in popular parlance, they mean words that look alike and mean alike and can be traced back to the same source, even if that source is borrowed e.g. Eng. paternal vs. Sp. paterno --which are only "cognate" due to a loan into English




Previous in thread: 68834
Next in thread: 68838
Previous message: 68834
Next message: 68836

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts