From: stlatos
Message: 68413
Date: 2012-01-24
>I am right. It's not my fault linguists have failed to see even the most obvious things I've discussed, or that you've chosen to believe them for no good reason.
> At 3:11:53 PM on Monday, January 23, 2012, stlatos wrote:
>
> > That makes no sense.
>
> Says the man who wrote
>
> The root * sak+ is identical to * kas+ 'cut' (as in cut >
> kill/sacifice > (be) sacred, etc.), since the order of C
> in a root, whether to each other or to V, didn't matter in
> PIE.
>
> and
>
> All known languages not currently classified as IE are
> actually from one branch of IE: Indo-Iranian.