Re: Latin -bs : just written or phonetic?

From: Joao S. Lopes
Message: 67926
Date: 2011-07-23

Maybe the conscience of preffix ab- helped to keep the B in abs-.

JS Lopes


De: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham@...>
Para: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Enviadas: Sábado, 23 de Julho de 2011 15:48
Assunto: [tied] Re: Latin -bs : just written or phonetic?

 
--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Rick McCallister <gabaroo6958@...> wrote:
>
> Evidently, Latin was like German and Russian and pronounced all final syllables unvoiced.

Wasn't final <d> v. final <t> the reflection of a phonetic distinction? At some stage we seem to have final V:d > V: (attested in writing, notably for the ablative singular) but final V:t > Vt (3s of verbs).

The word-internal assimilations -bs- > -ps- and -bt- > -pt- aren't always shown in writing.

Another curiosity is the non-assimilation in the prefix abs-. Perhaps the Romans were happy with the rule <bs> = /ps/.

Richard.