Re: xW/w (was: Lithuanian diphthongs)

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Rick McCallister <gabaroo6958@...> wrote:

>

___________________________

> From: Brian M. Scott <bm.brian@...>
> To: stlatos <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tue, June 14, 2011 3:36:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [tied] Re: xW/w (was: Lithuanian diphthongs)


>
> I tracked it down, I think: <uuithumlica> glosses <dotales>
> in what TITUS, Old Saxon Glosses, identifies as
> 'Vergilglossen in einer Oxforder handschrift', the ms. being
> identified as Oxf._Bodl._Auct._F._1._16.
>
> Brian
>
>
> ****R
> How great was the difference between Anglo-Saxon, Frisian and Old Saxon?
>

Not great enough to explain t/d/dh from one sound.