Re: xW/w (was: Lithuanian diphthongs)

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "stlatos" <stlatos@...> wrote:

>


> For example, ~standard * wèkW+ = speak/say, * wègWH+ = speak/say/vow, are too close together to be unrelated, and must actually be * wègWH-xY+ < wègWHdH-xY+ < wèkWdH-xY+ < wèkW+dHèxY+ = make statement / make vow.
>
>
> Metathesis is probably the origin of:
>
> *
> wegWH-xYónt+
> wexY-gWHónt+
> we_-gWHónt+
> wee-gWHónt+
>
> va:ghát- = one who makes offerings V S;
>

And, of course, metathesis is the origin of:

*
wègWH-xY+
xYèwgWH+
xYèugWH+

eúkhomai = pray/vow/boast G; oh- = notices/listens for V S; aog- = speak/say Av;


to put w by W and e by Y.