From: stlatos
Message: 67661
Date: 2011-05-31
>It seems that the source Indo-Ir l. was ancestral to or a close relative of Burushaski.
>
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "stlatos" <stlatos@> wrote:
> >
>
> > Yes, they're both < PIE * d.Hen.wr. d.Hen.wn.+ 'curved/bent _ / curved/hollow/sloping part of body / bow / tree to make bows'
>
> >
> > Skt
> > tad.a:ka-s 'tank/pool'
> > tad.aga-s 'pond'
> > tat.a:ka-m 'pool'
> > tat.aka-m 'shore'
> > tat.a-s\m 'slope/declivity/sloping part of body/shore'
> > dhánu- \ dhanú:- (f) 'dry sandbank / sandy shore'
> > dhanvana-s \ dhanvaga-s ' ~fruit tree'
> > dhánvan- 'bow'
> >
> > Bur >> Khow
> > t.s.Honz.òr 'stone bow'
> >
> >
> > Note the alt. dH / tH / t- and -n / r / g-, among others, both w/in and between. Some of the Skt forms might have been borrowed from another Indo-Ir l.
> >
>
>
> Whatever Indo-Ir l. was the source, it showed voicing alt. k/g and n. > d. , as also seen in:
>
>
> khad.gá-m 'iron'
> khad.gá-s 'sword'
> khaNgá-s 'sword'
> t.aNga-s 'sw/spade'
> t.aNka-s\m 'sw/sp/hatchet/hoe'
>
>
> all from PIE * kaLd.ó+ \ * kLd.ó+ 'branch/spear/sword' :
>
>
> *
> kLd.ó+
> kr.gó+
> kRgó+
> Aq'-RWuÑ'-GWÀ+
> AqH-XuÑ-gÀ+ AqH-Xud.-gÀ+ At.-r.uÑ-gÀ+ At.-r.ud.-gÀ+
>