(GK)
> The Peucini might, however, be an exception to this (after all they
> were a border people for areas of Roman interests), and so his
> tentative mention of the B. as within the "Germanic" fold might
> refer to that particular group. This would then be in line with (a)-
> type documentation from the 1rst c. CE (Pliny and Tacitus). But
> Strabo's information about the Bastarnae of the "interior" would be,
> possibly, less certain for his time.
Strabo 7, 3, 17
'In the interior dwell, first, those Bastarnians whose country borders on that of the Tyregetans and Germans — they also being, one might say, of Germanic stock; and they are divided up into several tribes, for a part of them are called Atmoni and Sidoni, while those who took possession of Peuce, the island in the Ister, are called "Peucini," whereas the "Roxolani" (the most northerly of them
all) roam the plains between the Tanaïs and the Borysthenes.'
I find your interpretation of Strabo strained. Peucini Germanic, Atmoni and Sidoni not? I'm not convinced.
****GK: Strabo is not even sure whether the Roxolani are (or not) "Germanic". All this quite in line with his comments in 7,2,4. Plus the minor complication of what he actually meant by "Germanic": (7,1,2: the Germans, who, though they vary slightly from the Celtic stock in that they are wilder, taller, and have yellower hair, are in all other respects similar, for in build, habits, and modes of life they are such as I have said the Celti are. And I also think that it was for this reason that the Romans assigned to them the name "Germani," as though they wished to indicate thereby that they were "genuine" Galatae, for in the language of the Romans "germani" means "genuine.") What I am saying is that Strabo had a better case about the Peucini being fundamentally Germanic in his time (early 1rst c. CE) than about the other Bastarnian groups,
about which his information was opaque and possibly out of date. Lots of things had occurred in Bastarnia since the time of Mithradates, not least the disappearance of the Poeneshti-Lukashovka people of the "interior". As for the Atmoni and Sidones of ca. 80 BCE, we have to decide (a) whether they were the Poeneshti-Lukashovka groups or (b) the Zarubinian groups or (c) some or all of either. And take our cues from additional indicators, as I have done.*****