From: Alexandru Moeller
Message: 67437
Date: 2011-04-30
> "t0lgsoo1" <guestuser.0x9357@...> wrote:it is hard to provide ad hoc datas when one does not work in a field of
> >
> > > > >So you're saying there was a settlement boom in Transylvania in
> > > > >the 16th-17th centuries?
> >
> > > > No boom, but the spreading of such suffixes as a... fad.
>
> > >I don't get it. If there was no settlement boom, then the boom of
> > >new -eşti names would have spread in existing settlements.
> >
> > Imagine a gradual "growth": after the first mentioning of
> > such place names, a *gradual* increase in number in a long
> > period of time: several centuries. Do not imagine a boom as
> > if a massive immigration had taken place (in 1-2-3 years)
> > (as if many people had run thither upon hearing one had
> > found... gold! :))
>
> Oh, it was a slow... fad.
> Bucureşti 1459
> Plorescht 1503
> lasting until today.
>
> > All written material (from a long period of time = centuries)
> > show that the place names with this ending are a quite late
> > occurrence.
>
> Except for Bucharest and Ploeşti?