From: Torsten
Message: 67036
Date: 2011-01-06
> Rolf Hachmann...
> Die Chronologie der jüngeren vorrömischen Eisenzeit
> pp. 123-4
> "The grave field PoieneÅti can be joined relatively easily and veryI should point out that this would mean that the PoieneÅti group does not, as Hachmann thinks, coincide in time with time section A of the Central German pre-Roman iron age, but predates it.
> convincingly with the Central German [approx. Thuringia and
> environs] chronology (cf. Fig 41).
> http://tech.dir.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/files/PhaseCorrespondenceBetweenThuringiaAndPoienesti.png
> [the Kobil group is a similar group in Bohemia]
> The late Latène fibula 'mit stufenförmigem Bügel' [with tiered
> body?], of which several occur here, is identical to the Central
> German version of this type. The band-shaped belt hooks with the end
> turned into an eyelet which are found in abundance in PoieneÅti,
> look similar to belt hooks, such as are found in eastern Central
> Germany and eg. in Cammer are represented in time group 3, in which
> also the fibulas 'mit stufenförmigem Bügel' appear. From this it is
> obvious, that the PoieneÅti group coincides in time with time
> section A of the Central German pre-Roman iron age. It is
> significant, that in PoieneÅti late Latène fibulas var. K and their
> contemporaries are completely absent. This doesn't directly mean
> that the PoieneÅti group doesn't stretch into time section B, but
> rather, that during time section A it detached itself from that
> Central German culture union to which it must originally have
> belonged. In any case, after detaching itself it had no significant
> further development in the set of forms. Thus one shouldn't assume
> the group lived on for very long after detaching itself"
>
> Which means, in my estimation, that after being routed by Burebista
> the Bastarnae evacuated PoieneÅti-LukaÅ¡evka-land and migrated to
> Central Germany.