From: And Rosta
Message: 66931
Date: 2010-12-04
> johnvertical@... <mailto:johnvertical%40hotmail.com> wrote:There are decent arguments for saying that the second syll in _window_, but not _hobo_, is weak/unstressed, to be analysed as /ǝw/. One argument is that prevocalically the syllabic /ǝ/ can elide, leaving [w], as can generally happen with stem-final /ǝC/: e.g. _following_ can be disyllabic, [fQlwIN]. A further argument is that the generalization can then be maintained that the 'nativest' polysyllabic morphemes can't end in a stressed syllable (i.e. the (IMO, true) generalization that John Vertical was seeking to capture). And a still further argument is that, as you mention, in some dialects, /ǝw/ (but not the GOAT vowel found in the last syll of _hobo_) is, or alternates with, /ǝ(r)/, which could be characterized as /w/-dropping.
>
> > In English, for example, you normally only find final
> > unstress'd syllables ending in consonants or -i ("lucky",
> > "doggie"), or -o ("hobo", "window"). However, that doesn't
> > stop words like "lava", "voodoo", "cafe" existing, and
> > having existed for centuries.
>
> <Hobo>, <window>, <voodoo>, and <cafe> do not end in
> unstressed syllables. In the first three the final syllable
> has secondary stress; in the last it has primary stress for
> me and many others and secondary stress for some. <Lava>
> does end in an unstressed syllable, but final unstressed /ǝ/
> is perfectly acceptable. Indeed, when the final syllable of
> <window> loses secondary stress, as it does for some
> speakers at least in informal speech, it's generally reduced
> to /-dǝ/.