Use of Huge Dictionaries (was: Lislakh)

From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 66922
Date: 2010-12-03

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "piervantrink" <piervantrink@...> wrote:

> 10/The Arabianic character of IE languages
> http://anthrocivitas.net/forum/showthread.php?p=68091#post68091

> There is an Arabic dictionnary written in the 13 th century wich is the compilation of older Arabic dictionnaries but whereas those older Arabic dictionnaries do contain as much as 2 mln words, this dictionnary called "lisan al 3arab" does contain more than 5,5 mln words and searching in it I did found around 460 out of around 550 proto Indo-European roots (wich is the total number of Indo-European roots and could be found in wiktionnary) with around 200 Arabic roots that do have identical phonetics and semantics than the Indo-European ones and the other being very similar with rather strict semantics and phonetics.

That's a lot of words seeing as there are only 614,656 words 4 consonants long. However, 5.5 million words is a combination of a great many authors' vocabularies, and is hardly likely to be a meaningful indication of what was in Proto-Semitic.

Would you please explain your 460 out of 500 and 200. Examples of each category of root or pair of roots would be helpful in explaining what you mean.

Richard.

Previous in thread: 66921
Next in thread: 66923
Previous message: 66921
Next message: 66923

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts