From: yiannis lanbrinakos
Message: 66565
Date: 2010-09-09
--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, johnvertical@... wrote:
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "stlatos" <wrote:
> >
> > The existence of Khowar òhts 'bear' makes it likely that
> > Finnish otso/ohto was borrowed from an Indo-Iranian l[anguage]
> > like Kh[owar], possibly even proto-Kh[owar].
>
> No, _otso_ is a recent hypercorrection based on _ohto_ (cf. Tampere
> dialectal _ketsu_ pro _kettu_ "fox"), which derives from older
> *okti .
The two of you have been discussing for weeks a Khowar word, transcribed as "òhts" by "stlatos", which isn't possibly even the correct form. Morgenstierne, later cited by Turner, has "orc" (with an underdot over the /c/, most likely representing a -ts sound). Morgenstierne postulates a "Kafir" (i.e. Nuristani) origin for this Khowar (Dardic Indo-Aryan) word:
http://tinyurl.com/39w7wj8
http://tinyurl.com/39xvqnz
http://tinyurl.com/392fyzu
Regards,
Francesco