From: Torsten
Message: 65666
Date: 2010-01-16
>Your evidence for that is that in
> This fellow is indeed quite hopeless...
>
> --- On Sat, 1/16/10, Torsten <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
>
> > GK: The problem with you ,Torsten, is that you seem incapable
> > of understanding that what you consider "disproof" is
> > scientifically inadequate.
>
> I haven't said anything of what I consider 'disproof', so I wonder
> what that's supposed to mean.
>
> > The standard view, which apparently dissatisfies you, is that
> > there is no evidence of any significant Sarmatian influx into the
> > area of the Przeworsk culture. You have been unable to point to
> > anything except "inhumations" , and that per se, is not a
> > defining Sarmatian trait.
>
> 1) the suddenly appearing upper layer in Przeworsk is characterized
> by inhumation and expensive Roman grave goods.
>
> 2) the graves of the Golden Cemetery are characterized by
> inhumation and expensive Roman grave goods.
>
> Nothing characteristically 'Sarmatian' about either.
>
>
> Cf.
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/64735
>
> The Przeworsk inhumations are not of any known Sarmatian type,
> unlike those of the Kuban. Elementary science, too complicated for
> our Odin fan.