From: Torsten
Message: 65330
Date: 2009-10-30
>Which do you mean, Brian's material above, which would make them 'the Pocupiners', or mine, corresponding to some vague 'the Revellers'?
>
> --- On Thu, 10/29/09, Torsten <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
>
> .
>
> > >
> > > His objection is misplaced, since several names clearly in
> > > <Ígul-> are known from runic inscriptions, as is the simplex
> > > <Ígull>. From Rundata, keeping only the spellings with <g>
> > > or <h>:
> > >
> > > Ígulbiörn
> > > Nom. ig(u)lbi(u)rn U667, ihulbarn U593, ihulbiarn *857,
> > > U925, ihulbiurn U901, U904, [ikulbiarn] U51+, ikulburn
> > > U963
> > > Acc. igulbiarn *922$, ihulbiarn Sö2, Sö141, ikulbiaurn
> > > Sö229,
> > >
> > > Ígulfastr
> > > Nom. ihulfastr *279, U961, ikulfastr U624, UFv1953;263
> > > Acc. ikulfast U939
> > >
> > > Ígulfríðr
> > > Nom. [ikulfriþ] U582+
> > >
> > > Ígull
> > > Nom. igul Sö350, ihul U620$, U940, U1027, U1047, ikul
> > > Sö232, U202
> > > Acc. igul Sö381, ihul U997, U1154, [ihul] U378, M14+,
> > > ikhul U758, ikul U624, (i)kul NA13
>
>
> ****GK: Is the tribal name "Igylliones" (reported by Ptolemy,
> Geogr. III.5) as located between Stavani and Costoboci related to
> this? If so, it would be quite interesting since these Igylliones,
> archaeologically, correspond to the merging East Przeworsk and west
> Zarubinian cultures in the mid- 1rst c. CE.****